<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1011 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 5,98,82,294/- as unexplained income under sections 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the assessee&#039;s contentions. The Tribunal also rejected the argument regarding the nature of the business involving accommodation entries. However, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal on household expenses, reducing the addition from Rs. 72,000/- to Rs. 36,000/-. The order was pronounced on March 20, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1011 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 5,98,82,294/- as unexplained income under sections 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the assessee&#039;s contentions. The Tribunal also rejected the argument regarding the nature of the business involving accommodation entries. However, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal on household expenses, reducing the addition from Rs. 72,000/- to Rs. 36,000/-. The order was pronounced on March 20, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>