<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1016 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177254</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding challenges under the Income Tax Act. It dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s order, stating that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to set aside the Assessing Authority&#039;s order. The Court found issues with the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order under Section 92CA, noting the absence of a valid return pending at the time of the reference. It emphasized that the Commissioner&#039;s intervention was unwarranted, as the Transfer Pricing Authority accepted the Assessing Authority&#039;s valuation. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the primary and consequential orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1016 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177254</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding challenges under the Income Tax Act. It dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s order, stating that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to set aside the Assessing Authority&#039;s order. The Court found issues with the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order under Section 92CA, noting the absence of a valid return pending at the time of the reference. It emphasized that the Commissioner&#039;s intervention was unwarranted, as the Transfer Pricing Authority accepted the Assessing Authority&#039;s valuation. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the primary and consequential orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>