<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 722 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177235</link>
    <description>The court granted an interim mandatory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, directing defendant No.1 to vacate the property at B-197, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, within one month. The court emphasized the plaintiff&#039;s sole ownership of the property, the balance of convenience, and the potential irreparable harm to the plaintiff and his wife. Defendant No.1 was allowed to shift to a rented accommodation offered by defendant No.2 or accept Rs. 30,000 towards rent pending a decision on her maintenance application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=412012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 722 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177235</link>
      <description>The court granted an interim mandatory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, directing defendant No.1 to vacate the property at B-197, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, within one month. The court emphasized the plaintiff&#039;s sole ownership of the property, the balance of convenience, and the potential irreparable harm to the plaintiff and his wife. Defendant No.1 was allowed to shift to a rented accommodation offered by defendant No.2 or accept Rs. 30,000 towards rent pending a decision on her maintenance application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>