<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proof of Export</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109661</link>
    <description>Where a shipping bill records the transaction term as C&amp;F but the exporter has no insurance policy, the exporter may represent to the bank that the sale was on a C&amp;F basis and therefore is not obliged to produce an insurance policy; banks should accept the exporter&#039;s declaration that insurance was not provided when the contractual term places insurance responsibility elsewhere, subject to the bank&#039;s internal conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:10:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proof of Export</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109661</link>
      <description>Where a shipping bill records the transaction term as C&amp;F but the exporter has no insurance policy, the exporter may represent to the bank that the sale was on a C&amp;F basis and therefore is not obliged to produce an insurance policy; banks should accept the exporter&#039;s declaration that insurance was not provided when the contractual term places insurance responsibility elsewhere, subject to the bank&#039;s internal conditions.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:10:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>