<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 528 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the identity of the share applicants was established, and hence, no addition under Section 68 was justified in the hands of the assessee company. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that if the Department deems the share applicants as bogus, they can reopen individual assessments but cannot make additions under Section 68 in the company&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 528 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the identity of the share applicants was established, and hence, no addition under Section 68 was justified in the hands of the assessee company. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that if the Department deems the share applicants as bogus, they can reopen individual assessments but cannot make additions under Section 68 in the company&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>