<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 109 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1813</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied merely because the invoices were issued by a second stage dealer where CBEC circulars recognised credit on such documents. The goods were supplied by the manufacturer to an intermediary who only consigned them onward, and the registered dealer later issued the invoice used for credit. On these facts, the circulars supported acceptance of the documents and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed, so the assessee&#039;s Cenvat credit claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 109 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1813</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied merely because the invoices were issued by a second stage dealer where CBEC circulars recognised credit on such documents. The goods were supplied by the manufacturer to an intermediary who only consigned them onward, and the registered dealer later issued the invoice used for credit. On these facts, the circulars supported acceptance of the documents and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed, so the assessee&#039;s Cenvat credit claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>