<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1684 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions based on seized material lacked justification and were arbitrary. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the deletion of the additions and the treatment of agricultural income as directed by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1684 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions based on seized material lacked justification and were arbitrary. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the deletion of the additions and the treatment of agricultural income as directed by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>