<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1214 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to club the income of the wife&#039;s firm with the husband&#039;s firm, ruling that there was no evidence of a &#039;benami&#039; business relationship between the two entities. The Tribunal found that the wife&#039;s initial denial of involvement in the business was due to nervousness during a search and that there was no nexus between the two firms. As a result, the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:14:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1214 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to club the income of the wife&#039;s firm with the husband&#039;s firm, ruling that there was no evidence of a &#039;benami&#039; business relationship between the two entities. The Tribunal found that the wife&#039;s initial denial of involvement in the business was due to nervousness during a search and that there was no nexus between the two firms. As a result, the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>