<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 178 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270386</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the write-off of Rs. 53,51,012/- for technical know-how fees was rightly treated as revenue expenditure. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, with the court emphasizing that the fees were incurred for the improvement of existing business operations and did not result in the creation of a capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 178 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270386</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the write-off of Rs. 53,51,012/- for technical know-how fees was rightly treated as revenue expenditure. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, with the court emphasizing that the fees were incurred for the improvement of existing business operations and did not result in the creation of a capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>