<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270381</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for eligible residential units and denying deduction for unbuilt housing sites. The appeals by both parties were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on deduction eligibility. The ITAT emphasized adherence to section 80IB(10) conditions and recognized separate housing projects within larger developments as eligible for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270381</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for eligible residential units and denying deduction for unbuilt housing sites. The appeals by both parties were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on deduction eligibility. The ITAT emphasized adherence to section 80IB(10) conditions and recognized separate housing projects within larger developments as eligible for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>