<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 159 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal within the limitation period due to the appellant&#039;s delayed receipt of the impugned order in 2014. Service tax was confirmed for Business Support Services and manpower recruitment, with specific deposit amounts required. The dispute over the nature of manpower recruitment services was settled, and pre-deposit conditions were imposed for hearing the appeal, with a waiver of the balance dues upon compliance within twelve weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 159 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal within the limitation period due to the appellant&#039;s delayed receipt of the impugned order in 2014. Service tax was confirmed for Business Support Services and manpower recruitment, with specific deposit amounts required. The dispute over the nature of manpower recruitment services was settled, and pre-deposit conditions were imposed for hearing the appeal, with a waiver of the balance dues upon compliance within twelve weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>