<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1805</link>
    <description>Slit strips arising during the manufacture of steel tubes were treated as unusable or defective strips, classified and cleared on payment of duty as a final product. Because the entire input had been issued for manufacture, the removed material was not inputs remaining as such, and its clearance did not amount to removal of inputs as such. On that basis, reversal of Modvat credit, duty demand, and penalties were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1805</link>
      <description>Slit strips arising during the manufacture of steel tubes were treated as unusable or defective strips, classified and cleared on payment of duty as a final product. Because the entire input had been issued for manufacture, the removed material was not inputs remaining as such, and its clearance did not amount to removal of inputs as such. On that basis, reversal of Modvat credit, duty demand, and penalties were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>