https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270360 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Adjudicating authority as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of not exceeding the exemption limit of Rs. 4.00 crores under Notification No. 8/2003-CE. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 5.00 lakh within eight weeks for compliance before the Adjudicating authority reevaluates the case with the necessary data and certificates. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing substantiated evidence in excise duty matters. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:09:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270360 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Adjudicating authority as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of not exceeding the exemption limit of Rs. 4.00 crores under Notification No. 8/2003-CE. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 5.00 lakh within eight weeks for compliance before the Adjudicating authority reevaluates the case with the necessary data and certificates. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing substantiated evidence in excise duty matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270360