https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270359 The appeal against the order withdrawing the penalty imposed on the respondent was dismissed. The adjudicating authority upheld the order-in-appeal, applying Section 80 of the Finance Act 1994 due to the respondent's lack of awareness of the law and prompt payment upon notification. The respondent's bonafides were not in doubt, indicating no mala fide intent. The appellant's argument for imposing penalties again was rejected as the facts favored the respondent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270359 The appeal against the order withdrawing the penalty imposed on the respondent was dismissed. The adjudicating authority upheld the order-in-appeal, applying Section 80 of the Finance Act 1994 due to the respondent's lack of awareness of the law and prompt payment upon notification. The respondent's bonafides were not in doubt, indicating no mala fide intent. The appellant's argument for imposing penalties again was rejected as the facts favored the respondent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270359