<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 147 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the valuation of goods and the reduction of redemption fine and penalty. The appellant&#039;s arguments on violation of natural justice, rejection of declared value, and imposition of penalty were not accepted. The Tribunal found that the appellant voluntarily waived the right to a show cause notice, accepted the valuation of goods without protest, and willfully infringed statutory provisions. With no representation during the hearing, the Tribunal proceeded to decide the case on its merits, ultimately affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:08:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 147 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the valuation of goods and the reduction of redemption fine and penalty. The appellant&#039;s arguments on violation of natural justice, rejection of declared value, and imposition of penalty were not accepted. The Tribunal found that the appellant voluntarily waived the right to a show cause notice, accepted the valuation of goods without protest, and willfully infringed statutory provisions. With no representation during the hearing, the Tribunal proceeded to decide the case on its merits, ultimately affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>