<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue&#039;s appeals filed in 2007 were not duly instituted according to law due to the non-impleadment of necessary parties, namely the Customs officers. The applications for impleadment filed in 2012 were rejected due to inordinate delay without satisfactory reasons. Consequently, the appeals, in the absence of necessary parties, could not be sustained and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue&#039;s appeals filed in 2007 were not duly instituted according to law due to the non-impleadment of necessary parties, namely the Customs officers. The applications for impleadment filed in 2012 were rejected due to inordinate delay without satisfactory reasons. Consequently, the appeals, in the absence of necessary parties, could not be sustained and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>