<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 144 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270352</link>
    <description>The court directed the 2nd respondent to quantify the tax to be paid by the petitioner for the release of goods within a week. Upon payment, non-prohibitory goods were to be released immediately, with the petitioner given liberty to adjudicate the compounding fee later. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:08:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 144 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270352</link>
      <description>The court directed the 2nd respondent to quantify the tax to be paid by the petitioner for the release of goods within a week. Upon payment, non-prohibitory goods were to be released immediately, with the petitioner given liberty to adjudicate the compounding fee later. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>