<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 143 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270351</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not condone the 448-day delay in filing Reference Applications by the Commissioner of Sales TaxUnion Territory of Daman and Diu. The Court emphasized that vague administrative difficulties were not a sufficient explanation for the delay, citing the lack of a detailed explanation supported by an affidavit. Referring to legal principles, the Court stated that Government bodies must provide reasonable justifications for delays, and in this case, the delay was not adequately explained, leading to the dismissal of the Writ Petitions challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 143 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270351</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not condone the 448-day delay in filing Reference Applications by the Commissioner of Sales TaxUnion Territory of Daman and Diu. The Court emphasized that vague administrative difficulties were not a sufficient explanation for the delay, citing the lack of a detailed explanation supported by an affidavit. Referring to legal principles, the Court stated that Government bodies must provide reasonable justifications for delays, and in this case, the delay was not adequately explained, leading to the dismissal of the Writ Petitions challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>