<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 140 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270348</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal after finding that the substantial legal questions raised by the appellant regarding the classification of the transaction as an inter-State sale, the maintainability of the appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of a second review application, and the interpretation of Section 11 of the Act lacked merit. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance and the limited scope of review proceedings, ultimately upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 140 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270348</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal after finding that the substantial legal questions raised by the appellant regarding the classification of the transaction as an inter-State sale, the maintainability of the appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of a second review application, and the interpretation of Section 11 of the Act lacked merit. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance and the limited scope of review proceedings, ultimately upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>