https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270347 In a cheque dishonour complaint, leave to appeal against acquittal was refused because the complainant failed to prove the alleged loan transaction with adequate particulars or supporting records, such as a dated advancement record, security document, account books, or income-tax return. The accused's explanation that the cheque had been issued only as security in another transaction was found probable, and the trial court's view that the Section 139 presumption stood rebutted was supported by the record. As the acquittal was neither perverse nor contrary to law, no ground existed to disturb it. en-us Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270347 In a cheque dishonour complaint, leave to appeal against acquittal was refused because the complainant failed to prove the alleged loan transaction with adequate particulars or supporting records, such as a dated advancement record, security document, account books, or income-tax return. The accused's explanation that the cheque had been issued only as security in another transaction was found probable, and the trial court's view that the Section 139 presumption stood rebutted was supported by the record. As the acquittal was neither perverse nor contrary to law, no ground existed to disturb it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270347