<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1366 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for assessment years 2003-04 and 2006-07 regarding the taxability of retention money. However, for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, instructing the Assessing Officer to consider excluding retention money. The matter was remanded for re-computation of total income, emphasizing the need for a substantive examination of the claim rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1366 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for assessment years 2003-04 and 2006-07 regarding the taxability of retention money. However, for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, instructing the Assessing Officer to consider excluding retention money. The matter was remanded for re-computation of total income, emphasizing the need for a substantive examination of the claim rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>