<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 62 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, holding that the CD ROMS qualified as computer software for exemption under Notification No. 11/97-CUS. It was found that the confiscation of the items and penalties imposed were unjustified as the CD ROMS were correctly declared and eligible for exemption. The Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement, ultimately disposing of all appeals in favor of the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 62 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, holding that the CD ROMS qualified as computer software for exemption under Notification No. 11/97-CUS. It was found that the confiscation of the items and penalties imposed were unjustified as the CD ROMS were correctly declared and eligible for exemption. The Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement, ultimately disposing of all appeals in favor of the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>