https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270332 The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals by the Revenue, admitting the appeals for assessment years 2001-02, 2008-09, and 2009-10. It upheld the assessee's claim of logo charges as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the payment of royalty as revenue expenditure, aligning with previous rulings, leading to the dismissal of all Revenue appeals. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270332 The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals by the Revenue, admitting the appeals for assessment years 2001-02, 2008-09, and 2009-10. It upheld the assessee's claim of logo charges as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the payment of royalty as revenue expenditure, aligning with previous rulings, leading to the dismissal of all Revenue appeals. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270332