<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 114 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (A) that the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act. It concluded that the assessee&#039;s activities constituted the manufacture or production of articles or things and that Unit-II was independently established. The alternate claim for deduction under Section 80IB(8A) was considered unnecessary due to the approval of the primary claim under Section 10B. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 114 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (A) that the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act. It concluded that the assessee&#039;s activities constituted the manufacture or production of articles or things and that Unit-II was independently established. The alternate claim for deduction under Section 80IB(8A) was considered unnecessary due to the approval of the primary claim under Section 10B. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>