<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1011 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177129</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in filing appeals, when not satisfactorily explained, justified dismissal without condonation. The Court noted a delay of 1062 days and held that the unexplained lapse was sufficient to reject the appeals on that ground. Independently, the Court examined the record and found no merit in the grounds advanced, so the appeals were also dismissed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1011 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177129</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in filing appeals, when not satisfactorily explained, justified dismissal without condonation. The Court noted a delay of 1062 days and held that the unexplained lapse was sufficient to reject the appeals on that ground. Independently, the Court examined the record and found no merit in the grounds advanced, so the appeals were also dismissed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>