<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177137</link>
    <description>The assessee appealed against the exclusion of receipts from trading of carbon credit and insurance claim while computing the deduction under sec.80IA. The Hon&#039;ble Andhra Pradesh HC held that income from the sale of excess carbon credit is a capital receipt, not business income. The ITAT Chennai followed this judgment and excluded carbon credit receipts. The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, holding that receipts from the sale of excess carbon credit are capital receipts. The issue of notional carry forward of depreciation for sec.80IA deduction was partially allowed for the assessee and dismissed for the Revenue based on relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:57:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177137</link>
      <description>The assessee appealed against the exclusion of receipts from trading of carbon credit and insurance claim while computing the deduction under sec.80IA. The Hon&#039;ble Andhra Pradesh HC held that income from the sale of excess carbon credit is a capital receipt, not business income. The ITAT Chennai followed this judgment and excluded carbon credit receipts. The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, holding that receipts from the sale of excess carbon credit are capital receipts. The issue of notional carry forward of depreciation for sec.80IA deduction was partially allowed for the assessee and dismissed for the Revenue based on relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>