<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 106 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270314</link>
    <description>Unutilized accumulated Cenvat credit remained refundable under Rule 5 on export of final products, even though the exported electric vehicles had become exempt from central excise duty. CESTAT relied on binding High Court rulings and found no basis to depart from them, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s objection that exemption of the final product defeated refund entitlement. The Commissioner (Appeals) order granting refund was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2017 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 106 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270314</link>
      <description>Unutilized accumulated Cenvat credit remained refundable under Rule 5 on export of final products, even though the exported electric vehicles had become exempt from central excise duty. CESTAT relied on binding High Court rulings and found no basis to depart from them, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s objection that exemption of the final product defeated refund entitlement. The Commissioner (Appeals) order granting refund was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>