<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 104 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty for alleged clandestine removal due to lack of corroborative evidence supporting the Managing Director&#039;s statements. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief as the charge of clandestine removal was deemed unsustainable without concrete evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 104 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty for alleged clandestine removal due to lack of corroborative evidence supporting the Managing Director&#039;s statements. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief as the charge of clandestine removal was deemed unsustainable without concrete evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>