<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 99 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270307</link>
    <description>Dobby cards, treated as accessories of weaving machines, were considered capital goods because accessories of capital goods fall within the capital goods definition under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The restriction denying exemption for goods used in exempt final products was held to apply to inputs, not to capital goods or their accessories. On that basis, the benefit of Notification No. 67/95-CE was available and the denial of exemption was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 99 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270307</link>
      <description>Dobby cards, treated as accessories of weaving machines, were considered capital goods because accessories of capital goods fall within the capital goods definition under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The restriction denying exemption for goods used in exempt final products was held to apply to inputs, not to capital goods or their accessories. On that basis, the benefit of Notification No. 67/95-CE was available and the denial of exemption was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>