<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 93 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270301</link>
    <description>A pending challenge to suspension of a customs broker licence became infructuous when the adjudicating authority later revoked the suspension under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2013 and permitted the broker to operate. Once the foundational relief against suspension had been superseded by the subsequent order, no live controversy remained on that issue, so the appeal could not continue on the suspension question. The same order also directed forfeiture of the full security deposit, which formed part of the operative consequence of the revocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 93 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270301</link>
      <description>A pending challenge to suspension of a customs broker licence became infructuous when the adjudicating authority later revoked the suspension under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2013 and permitted the broker to operate. Once the foundational relief against suspension had been superseded by the subsequent order, no live controversy remained on that issue, so the appeal could not continue on the suspension question. The same order also directed forfeiture of the full security deposit, which formed part of the operative consequence of the revocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>