https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270297 The Madras HC held that the assessment could not be sustained where the turnover difference between the annual report and monthly returns was disputed on the basis of additional return materials said to be available with the assessee. As the annual report figures were said to include consolidated branch and out-of-State unit turnover, and the assessee had collected relevant return copies for production, the matter required fresh consideration. The impugned assessment was set aside and remitted for reconsideration after the assessee produced the manual copies of returns and was heard. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270297 The Madras HC held that the assessment could not be sustained where the turnover difference between the annual report and monthly returns was disputed on the basis of additional return materials said to be available with the assessee. As the annual report figures were said to include consolidated branch and out-of-State unit turnover, and the assessee had collected relevant return copies for production, the matter required fresh consideration. The impugned assessment was set aside and remitted for reconsideration after the assessee produced the manual copies of returns and was heard. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270297