<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 619 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177117</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta set aside the order requiring a pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the importance of fair representation before making decisions. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the recalling application with leniency and instructed a conscientious review. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and parties were granted access to urgent certified copies of the order upon fulfilling formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:45:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 619 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177117</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta set aside the order requiring a pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the importance of fair representation before making decisions. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the recalling application with leniency and instructed a conscientious review. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and parties were granted access to urgent certified copies of the order upon fulfilling formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>