<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 941 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, permitting them to adjust duty paid excess or less from their depots without resorting to refund provisions under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal clarified that such adjustments were permissible as long as the duty paid at factory clearance was appropriate, and any differences in duty amounts due to varying depot sale prices did not result in unjust enrichment. The judgment was delivered on 23-7-2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 941 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, permitting them to adjust duty paid excess or less from their depots without resorting to refund provisions under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal clarified that such adjustments were permissible as long as the duty paid at factory clearance was appropriate, and any differences in duty amounts due to varying depot sale prices did not result in unjust enrichment. The judgment was delivered on 23-7-2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>