https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177103 A body for whose benefit land is acquired may be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC where its presence is necessary for complete adjudication, particularly when the validity of acquisition and the compensation burden directly affect it. The later of two co-equal Supreme Court decisions was treated as the controlling authority where the earlier and later views conflicted. On that basis, the refusal to implead the acquiring body was set aside and the body was directed to be added as a defendant so the land acquisition dispute could be effectively determined. en-us Thu, 19 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:52:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177103 A body for whose benefit land is acquired may be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC where its presence is necessary for complete adjudication, particularly when the validity of acquisition and the compensation burden directly affect it. The later of two co-equal Supreme Court decisions was treated as the controlling authority where the earlier and later views conflicted. On that basis, the refusal to implead the acquiring body was set aside and the body was directed to be added as a defendant so the land acquisition dispute could be effectively determined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177103