<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177098</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed a writ petition by a Sugar Mill seeking a refund of excise duty paid on stored molasses. Despite the court order for refund, the respondent department issued a show cause notice demanding repayment. The court quashed the notice, emphasizing compliance with its order. If the department succeeded in their appeal, they were to act as per the Division Bench&#039;s decision. No costs were awarded, and the related petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177098</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed a writ petition by a Sugar Mill seeking a refund of excise duty paid on stored molasses. Despite the court order for refund, the respondent department issued a show cause notice demanding repayment. The court quashed the notice, emphasizing compliance with its order. If the department succeeded in their appeal, they were to act as per the Division Bench&#039;s decision. No costs were awarded, and the related petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>