https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177081 After vesting of proprietary rights in the State under the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, a decree for possession based solely on the former proprietary title became inexecutable, and the executing court could refuse enforcement. The disputed land also was not proved to be the proprietor's home-farm, because it was not shown to be recorded as sir or khudkasht in the relevant papers or otherwise brought within the statutory saving. The proprietor therefore had no surviving right to recover possession, while the occupant's later status under the post-vesting regime supported resistance to execution. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:18:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177081 After vesting of proprietary rights in the State under the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, a decree for possession based solely on the former proprietary title became inexecutable, and the executing court could refuse enforcement. The disputed land also was not proved to be the proprietor's home-farm, because it was not shown to be recorded as sir or khudkasht in the relevant papers or otherwise brought within the statutory saving. The proprietor therefore had no surviving right to recover possession, while the occupant's later status under the post-vesting regime supported resistance to execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177081