<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1591 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 21,32,000 as business income from the sale of agricultural land. The judgment clarified that the transaction did not qualify as an adventure in the nature of trade or business, as the assessee&#039;s involvement was limited to selling the land without engaging in commercial development or trade activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1591 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 21,32,000 as business income from the sale of agricultural land. The judgment clarified that the transaction did not qualify as an adventure in the nature of trade or business, as the assessee&#039;s involvement was limited to selling the land without engaging in commercial development or trade activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>