<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1024 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that modvat/cenvat receipts should be excluded for section 80IB computation, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Liberty India Vs. CIT. It held that DEPB/Duty drawback benefits are not part of eligible industrial undertakings&#039; net profits for deduction purposes. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that only net transport receipts should be considered for exclusion in computing section 80IB deduction, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1024 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that modvat/cenvat receipts should be excluded for section 80IB computation, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Liberty India Vs. CIT. It held that DEPB/Duty drawback benefits are not part of eligible industrial undertakings&#039; net profits for deduction purposes. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that only net transport receipts should be considered for exclusion in computing section 80IB deduction, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>