<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1210 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the IT Act, ruling that the CIT did not independently assess the case but relied on the ITO&#039;s proposal. As the CIT failed to form his own satisfaction before invoking Section 263, the notice was deemed void ab initio. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the CIT to examine records personally. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1210 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the IT Act, ruling that the CIT did not independently assess the case but relied on the ITO&#039;s proposal. As the CIT failed to form his own satisfaction before invoking Section 263, the notice was deemed void ab initio. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the CIT to examine records personally. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>