<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1006 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the revenue&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the income by allowing 70% of the disputed expenses as revenue expenditure and disallowing 30% as capital expenditure. The Tribunal stressed the importance of thoroughly verifying the nature of each expense to accurately classify them as either capital or revenue expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1006 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the revenue&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the income by allowing 70% of the disputed expenses as revenue expenditure and disallowing 30% as capital expenditure. The Tribunal stressed the importance of thoroughly verifying the nature of each expense to accurately classify them as either capital or revenue expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>