<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1008 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177034</link>
    <description>Rule 3-A(8) and Rule 3-A(9) of the Gujarat Specified Co-operative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982 were construed as a mandatory scheme for geographical delimitation of constituencies in specified societies. Where the area of operation extends beyond one village, the number of constituencies must correspond to the number of seats, excluding reserved seats, and the Collector has independent power to delimit constituencies before publication of the voters list. The Rules operate notwithstanding contrary bye-laws, so a society&#039;s single-constituency bye-law cannot override the statutory election framework. The Court upheld the Collector&#039;s delimitation orders and rejected the challenge based on the bye-laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1008 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177034</link>
      <description>Rule 3-A(8) and Rule 3-A(9) of the Gujarat Specified Co-operative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982 were construed as a mandatory scheme for geographical delimitation of constituencies in specified societies. Where the area of operation extends beyond one village, the number of constituencies must correspond to the number of seats, excluding reserved seats, and the Collector has independent power to delimit constituencies before publication of the voters list. The Rules operate notwithstanding contrary bye-laws, so a society&#039;s single-constituency bye-law cannot override the statutory election framework. The Court upheld the Collector&#039;s delimitation orders and rejected the challenge based on the bye-laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>