<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1208 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of the amount received under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue of financial charges as capital expenditure was not pursued by the appellant, leading to its dismissal. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a detailed analysis of account transactions and legal interpretation, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1208 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of the amount received under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue of financial charges as capital expenditure was not pursued by the appellant, leading to its dismissal. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a detailed analysis of account transactions and legal interpretation, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>