<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 75 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The decision underscored the importance of proving the nature of services rendered by non-resident agents and establishing the source of income to determine tax liability under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 75 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The decision underscored the importance of proving the nature of services rendered by non-resident agents and establishing the source of income to determine tax liability under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>