<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 70 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the applicability of section 50C on leasehold rights, ruling that the assessee did not hold absolute ownership and therefore section 50C did not apply. The Tribunal remanded the issue of admission of additional evidence back to the Assessing Officer for proper consideration. Additionally, the deletion of Short Term Capital Gain addition was sent back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision after considering all evidence. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee&#039;s cross objection was dismissed as &quot;not pressed.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 70 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the applicability of section 50C on leasehold rights, ruling that the assessee did not hold absolute ownership and therefore section 50C did not apply. The Tribunal remanded the issue of admission of additional evidence back to the Assessing Officer for proper consideration. Additionally, the deletion of Short Term Capital Gain addition was sent back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision after considering all evidence. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee&#039;s cross objection was dismissed as &quot;not pressed.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>