https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270264 Review jurisdiction was invoked against the appellate order dated 5-5-2015, but the Court found no error, much less any apparent error, on the face of the record after examining the petition and connected papers. As no demonstrable mistake or other ground for interference under review jurisdiction was shown, the Court held that the review petition was not maintainable on merits and declined to reconsider the earlier appellate order. The review petition was dismissed for want of error apparent on the face of the impugned order. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:09:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270264 Review jurisdiction was invoked against the appellate order dated 5-5-2015, but the Court found no error, much less any apparent error, on the face of the record after examining the petition and connected papers. As no demonstrable mistake or other ground for interference under review jurisdiction was shown, the Court held that the review petition was not maintainable on merits and declined to reconsider the earlier appellate order. The review petition was dismissed for want of error apparent on the face of the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270264