https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270263 The Tribunal dismissed the ROM application filed by the appellant as it was beyond the statutory timeframe prescribed under Section 129B of the Customs Act. The appellant's argument that the time limit should be counted from the date of receipt of the order was rejected, and the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the date of the order itself. The decision was supported by precedents from the Hon'ble High Courts of Karnataka and Delhi, highlighting the significance of complying with the prescribed time limit for filing such applications. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:08:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270263 The Tribunal dismissed the ROM application filed by the appellant as it was beyond the statutory timeframe prescribed under Section 129B of the Customs Act. The appellant's argument that the time limit should be counted from the date of receipt of the order was rejected, and the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the date of the order itself. The decision was supported by precedents from the Hon'ble High Courts of Karnataka and Delhi, highlighting the significance of complying with the prescribed time limit for filing such applications. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270263