<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 51 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270259</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction under section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 attracts the statutory consequence of dismissal of the appeal. The text notes that although the High Court reduced the required deposit and granted further time, no compliance report or other material showed obedience to the modified direction within the stipulated period. In the absence of proof of compliance, the appeal was dismissed for failure to satisfy the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 51 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270259</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction under section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 attracts the statutory consequence of dismissal of the appeal. The text notes that although the High Court reduced the required deposit and granted further time, no compliance report or other material showed obedience to the modified direction within the stipulated period. In the absence of proof of compliance, the appeal was dismissed for failure to satisfy the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>