<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270254</link>
    <description>A writ court may still intervene despite an available statutory appeal where the assessment is contrary to binding precedent and the alternative remedy would be futile. In this tax dispute, the court treated the challenge to the manufacturing-loss assessment as fit for interference and held that the assessee should not be denied a meaningful opportunity on the purchase-tax issue. It directed that the assessee be allowed to produce books of account and supporting records, subject to deposit of part of the demand, so the assessing authority could reconsider the disputed turnover omission. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remitted for limited reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:07:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270254</link>
      <description>A writ court may still intervene despite an available statutory appeal where the assessment is contrary to binding precedent and the alternative remedy would be futile. In this tax dispute, the court treated the challenge to the manufacturing-loss assessment as fit for interference and held that the assessee should not be denied a meaningful opportunity on the purchase-tax issue. It directed that the assessee be allowed to produce books of account and supporting records, subject to deposit of part of the demand, so the assessing authority could reconsider the disputed turnover omission. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remitted for limited reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>