<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 934 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the revenue authorities were not justified in taxing the long-term capital gain amount in question. The Tribunal found that the transaction was part of a family arrangement and not a direct sale, therefore not constituting a transfer attracting capital gains tax. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the sum of capital gain was deemed not chargeable to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:38:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=411554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 934 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the revenue authorities were not justified in taxing the long-term capital gain amount in question. The Tribunal found that the transaction was part of a family arrangement and not a direct sale, therefore not constituting a transfer attracting capital gains tax. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the sum of capital gain was deemed not chargeable to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>