<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1766</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in assessing the banking company&#039;s income at a rate of 55% instead of 60%. The Court found that the income earned from securities in the banking business should be treated as business income, emphasizing the bank&#039;s predominant business activity was banking, not investment. The decision was based on the close nexus between the banking business and placing funds in government securities, in compliance with the Banking Regulation Act. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the bank should be treated as an investment company due to income percentages, confirming the lower tax rate for the bank.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1766</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in assessing the banking company&#039;s income at a rate of 55% instead of 60%. The Court found that the income earned from securities in the banking business should be treated as business income, emphasizing the bank&#039;s predominant business activity was banking, not investment. The decision was based on the close nexus between the banking business and placing funds in government securities, in compliance with the Banking Regulation Act. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the bank should be treated as an investment company due to income percentages, confirming the lower tax rate for the bank.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>